Tuesday, June 16, 2020

SharonSenate64LegalHS1058SummitAveSt.Paul,MNCityEquitySkimming4Decades198xto2020


             To Whom it may concern; VOTE RED NOV3RD2020
                          SHARONSENATE64TRUMP SUPPORTER CREDITS TO BILL WINDSOR   
 Tom Fitton http://judicialwatch.org
                  Why Affiant hereinafter Sharon Anderson aka Peterson 1st husband Scarrella, Files and Blogs from her Legal HOMESTEAD at 1058 Summit Ave St.No Statute of Limitations on Fraud or Murder.
                 EQUITY SKIMMING FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCES DEFAULT   https://sharon4council.blogspot.com/2008/05/sharons-default-judgments-v-city-

 
                 In the event MNAG Muslin Keith Ellison trys to lay a Felony on Sharon from her Legal Domicle 1058 Summit Ave BRING IT ON 
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca8/09-1528/091209p-2011-02-25.htmlhttps://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca8/09-1528/091209p-2011-02-25.html
Political Party
Sharon AndersonRepublican
 
Residence AddressCampaign Address
LEGAL 1058 SUMMIT AVE
ST. PAUL, MN 55104
697 SURREY AVE
ST. PAUL, MN 55106
 
Candidate WebsitePhone Number
http://sharonsenate64.blogspot.com(651) 7765835
 
View Voluntary DisclosureEmail
 sharon4anderson@aol.com
 
 
State Senator District 64
  Candidate NamePartyWebsiteFile Date
 Patricia Jirovec McArdellLegal Marijuana Now 5/19/2020
 Sharon AndersonRepublicanhttp://sharonsenate64.blogspot.com5/21/2020
 Erin MurphyDemocratic-Farmer-Labor 5/22/2020
 
 
                 Clerk Fred Grittner was not a Judge THEREFORE; said Judgment dtd. Apr 19th,1989 from file 495722 Lesbian Judge Kathleen Gearin. taking homestead when property taxes were paid, Sharon and her 2nd husband both on Disability at that time. Prohibited Purscher Asst AG James Donnelly and Llyods,Bober Drugstore Pharmasists.  https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/slipopinion/19
https://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/sharons-trusttrilogy?next_slideshow=1
 Paul,MN.
                 1. TENANTS IN COMMON DENIED  Due
http://petersonfamilytree.blogspot.com
Mother Died May 1984, Ran4Mayor 1983 process.Sent: 6/15/2020 10:32:28 AM Central Standard Time
 
 
 
Subject: Check out state legislation proposal-2012-09-26.pdf

state legislation proposal-2012-09-26.pdf
Lawless A 28 U.S.C. § 1691 requires that all orders must be signed and issued under seal.
In my experience, federal courts rarely issue legal orders....
The word "process"� at 28 U.S.C. § 1691 means a court order.  See Middleton Paper Co. v. Rock River Paper Co., 19 F. 252 (C.C. W.D. Wisconsin 1884);  Taylor v. U.S., 45 F. 531 (C.C. E.D. Tennessee 1891);  U.S. v. Murphy, 82 F. 893 (DCUS Delaware 1897);  Leas & McVitty v. Merriman, 132 F. 510 (C.C. W.D. Virginia 1904);  U.S. v. Sharrock, 276 F. 30 (DCUS Montana 1921);  In re Simon, 297 F. 942, 34 ALR 1404 (2nd Cir. 1924);  Scanbe Mfg. Co. v. Tryon, 400 F.2d 598 (9th Cir. 1968);  and Miles v. Gussin, 104 B.R. 553 (Bankruptcy D.C. 1989).
"The legal meaning of the word 'process' varies according to the context, subject matter, and spirit of the statute in which it occurs. [United States v. Kinney, D.C., 264 F. 542, writ of error dismissed 254 U.S. 663, 41 S. Ct. 64, 65 L. Ed. 464; United States v. Murphy, D.C., 82 F. 893.] In some jurisdictions codes or statutes variously define 'process' as signifying or including: A writ or summons issued in the course of judicial proceedings; all writs, warrants, summonses, and orders of courts of justice or judicial officers; or any writ, declaration, summons, order, or subpoena whereby any action, suit, or proceeding shall be commenced, or which shall be issued in or upon any action, suit, or proceeding". 50 Cor. Jur. 442. "The term 'process' includes any writ of summons, subpoena or order * * * issued in or upon any action, * * * brought in any court * * * having jurisdiction of the subject-matter." Ex parte Schollenberger, 96 U.S. 369, 374, 24 L. Ed. 853. "A 'process' is merely a formal writing issued by authority of law. In re Martin, 86 N.J.Eq. 265, 98 A. 510; State v. Superior Court of Thurston County, 139 wash. 454, 247 P. 942; see, also, In re Simon [2 Cir.], 297 F. 942; Frank Adams Elec. Co. v. Witman, 16 Ga.App. 574, 85 S.E. 819." Massey v. United States, D.C., 46 F.2d 78, 79. (United States v. Fore, 38 F. Supp. 142 (03/10/1941).)
"The term 'process' is not limited to 'summons.' In its broadest sense it is equivalent to, or synonymous with, 'procedure,' or 'proceeding.'  ...the term is also broadly defined as the means whereby a court compels a compliance with its demands."� 72 CJS Process § 2, at 589 (1987).
See also Chisholm v. Gilmer, 299 U.S. 99 (1936).
Furthermore, the word "process" itself implies court action. It is generally defined as the means by which a court compels the appearance of a defendant before it or by which the court compels a compliance with its demands. Black's Law Dictionary (Revised Fourth Edition 1968), p. 1370; United States v. Kinney, 264 F. 542 (E.D.Pa.1920); United States v. Fore, 38 F.Supp. 142 (S.D.Cal.1941); 72 C.J.S. Process § 1; State v. Sullivan, 245 Wis. 180, 13 N.W.2d 550 (1944). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1691-1696. (Girardier v. Webster College, 563 F.2d 126 (1977.)
It is clear that an order is a "process," and thus must be signed and issued under seal as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1691.
But in my cases in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, there are only a few orders that have been signed and issued under seal.  In my five actions in the United States Supreme Court, there has never been an order signed and issued under seal.  Note: There is no statute that allows a judge to sign using /s/, but even if there was, the orders do not bear the required seal.
This is a legal order -- signed and sealed with signature of the Clerk of the Court.
Here are three ILLEGAL so-called "Orders" just issued on three petitions that a man filed in the United States Supreme Court.
Here is one of hundreds of examples from my actions in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.
Here are some of my invalid orders from the U.S. Supreme Court.
It is my opinion that if the orders issued in a case were not signed and sealed, they are void.  Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 60(b) and 60(d) provide a procedure where you can file a motion (60(b)) or a new complaint (60(d)) to set aside the orders and judgments in your case.
I am not an attorney, and I do not offer legal advice.  I am simply sharing the results of the thousands of hours that I have spent conducting legal research into legal and judicial corruption.

William M. Windsor


I, William M. Windsor, am not an attorney.  This website expresses my OPINIONS.   The comments of visitors to the website are their opinions and do not therefore reflect my opinions.  This website does not provide legal advice.  I do not give legal advice.  I do not practice law. This website is to expose corruption in government, law enforcement, and the judiciary. Whatever this website says about the law is presented in the context of how I or others perceive the applicability of the law to a set of circumstances if I (or some other author) was in the circumstances under the conditions discussed.  Despite of my concerns about lawyers in general, I suggest that anyone with legal questions consult an attorney for an answer, particularly after reading anything on this website.  The law is a gray area at best.  Please read our Legal Notice and Terms.
merica - Judicial Corruption and Government Corruption Exposed"The district court held that 'the injunction signed only by a deputy clerk of the District Court is void' for want of a judicial signature. Section 1691 of Title 28, U.S.C. (which was not called to the attention of the district court) provides that 'All writs and process issuing from a court of the United States shall be under the seal of the court and signed by the clerk thereof.'"  In view of the clear provisions of the statute, the judgment must be reversed." (Scanbe Mfg. Co. v. Tryon, 400 F.2d 598 (9th Cir. 1968).)
xx
Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com 

The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message," 
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based 
actions. Authorized carriers of this message 
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients.  See: Quon 
v. Arch

Friday, April 24, 2020

St.PaulCity/RCo/ 4/22/2020 25ConsentAgendDecadesSharonsIllegalEviction1058SummitviaLJudgesSmith/Gerain

                               23Apr2020
                Again Notices to the Above Named,Media,Interested Partys

                          AFFIANT Sharon4USA Trump Supporter must inform re QuiTam Relator Sharon Scarrella Anderson vs. State of MN, City St. Paul, Ramsey County, John Doe and Mary Roe.
                          Founded by Ambassador Nikki Haley, Stand for America is an advocacy group promoting public policies that strengthen America’s economy, culture, and national security.


Earl R. Larson - Wikipedia             Tid Bit of Info re Federal Judge John Tunheim former Clerk for Judge Earl Larson  We were 10 min late, 1979 Access to State and Federal Courts DENIED to any/all Pro Se Litigats.John R. Tunheim - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › John_R._Tunheim
Tunheim then became a law clerk to Judge Earl Larson of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota from 1980 to 1981, and was in private ...

Bullock v. Minnesota, 611 F.2d 258 | Casetext


                          "LEARNED IN LAW NEVER DEFINED BY MN LEGISLATURES"
http;//richard-bullock.blogspot.com

casetext.com › ... › 1979 › December

Dick Bullock, Rev. Sharon Scarrella, and Rev. Lyle V. Rambo, pro se. Erica Jacobson, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Minn., for appellees. Appeal from the United ...
                                          COUNT I
Signed Petition China's Deception re Virus 
Stop Communist China
“China’s Communist government needs to be held accountable for their role in lying about the Coronavirus pandemic, and the U.S. Congress needs to respond – now. Join us in our fight to stop China from gaining influence in America and around the world. Sign this petition and please share with your friends.”

                                         

                                                  

                                        COUNT III DisparityFees/Excessive Inspections 
St. Paul Mayor Melvin Carter proposes reduced fees and finesFee/Assessments Refunded/vacated
Discussion on TwinCities.com  15 comments
                               City Clerk Shari Moore must read Comments on line and on Tela prompter

From impound lot to business licenses, St. Paul Mayor Carter seeks wide-ranging discounts for fees and fines



Notice to Mayor its time to eliminate the Perks of City Employment such as Employees Cars,Maintenance,Insurance paid out of Taxpayers Funds, Time to Furlough non essiental employees, lay off, further now Homesteads are Office by Remote, must be assessed accordingly.http://sharons-foia.blogspot.com
 https://media3.giphy.com/me...

City heading toward Bankruptcy Disparity Waving Fees for one class/cars, must also Wave all Fees4Excessive Inspections, Further now all Schools closed rest of year ie Walzting Matilda or Timmys Twits oops Tweets, THEREFORE Waive all Propertys taxes to School Board https://www.mnd.uscourts.go...

EditView

4/22/2020Export to iCalendar3:30 PMCouncil Chambers - 3rd FloorMeeting detailsAgenda AgendaNot availableVideo Video

re 559 McKnight Anderson
In a message dated 4/21/2020 9:01:22 AM Central Standard Time, sharon4anderson@aol.com writes:

                            Tues 21Apr2020  TO THE ABOVE NAMED,MEDIA,STATEMN,COUNTYRAMSEY,CITYSTPAUL,MN,COURTS ETAL.

                      AFFIANT CURRENT WIDOW,WHITE WOMAN WHISTLEBLOWER, FOR YEARS QUITAM RELATOR SHARON4USA OWNER IN FEE SIMPLE ABSOLUTE, LAND PATENT but for on this Anniversay of Illegal Eviction.
is Still Alive, will fight Corrupt Official to the Death.
                         FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT AT THIS TIME

Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com 

The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message," 
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based 
actions. Authorized carriers of this message 
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients.  See: Quon 
v. Arch
In a message dated 4/15/2020 11:37:51 AM Central Standard Time, sharon4anderson@aol.com writes:

  Wed15Apr2020
                Published to make
Sharons-FCC Government Accountable  Not Dead yet, God keeping me around to make you guys Follow the Constitution and Law.



Thursday, March 26, 2020

St.PaulHometownPaperCensorFreeSpeechreCoronaVirus2020CarterBridgePlan

St. Paul mayor proposes $3.25 million bridge fund amid COVID-19 crisis

Sharon4USA
Detected as spam Thanks, we'll work on getting this corrected.
Thus.26Mar2020
TO the Above Named, Media et al Council MEETING MAR 25TH2020
Any Disparaging remarks vs President Donald Trump at this Crisis Cova-19
Health Issues is NOT taken lightly.
THEREFORE SANCTUARY CITY ST. PAUL,MN
GUIDE YOURSELVES ACCORDINGLY.
City of Saint Paul - Calendar
MAYOR CARTER ANNOUNCES RELIEF FUND
Mayor Carter at Council
View the meeting by clicking the photo above.
Today Mayor Carter announced a $3.25 million
Meeting details Agenda Agenda Not available Video Video
Affiant Sharon4USA Senior takes issue with Carters Relief Fund, has No Provisions 4 Seniors,Homeless,Disabled and or Property Tax Relief.
Further Video RElay DOES NOT at this time provide for Public Input in Video.
As usual t
Sharons-QuiTamsharons-quitam.blogspot.com
he Consent Agenda was Wacked thro without decending to particulars n a message dated 3/24/2020 5:19:18 AM Central Standard Time, sharon4anderson@aol.com writes:
Easier Read Submitted 4 Council Meeting Wed.25Mar2020
Sharons-QuiTam
Affiant banks online pa
u.s. bank fined $613 million - Google Searchy taxes via US bank which handles All Ramsey County Property
Tax payments
Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com
http://blogitbabe.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogs...
Sharon4USA
Watched on Cable, Compliments to Tech Staff to View Council Members at home, Kudos to Mayor to place blame on Federal Government and Stock Market Disparity of Selecting Low income, while not address's Seniors and Homeless persons Finally Marcia Mormond went thro approx 40 items deleting most from Tax Assessments, Garbarge Bills laid over to June 10 http://sharons-foia.blogspo...